By Dr Rainer Ebert and Dr Guaiqiong Li

For some, it’s as routine as paying at the checkout counter. For others, it’s as nerve-wracking as a prostate exam, and as undignified as being reprimanded in front of class. Which experience you have depends largely on one thing: where you were born. We’re talking about international travel.

Lately, Western travellers trying to enter the United States have been getting a taste of what it can be like to be a traveller from the Global South. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, there have been a number of widely publicised incidents of tourists as well as visa and green card holders getting a rough welcome at the United States border.

A rough welcome

Lucas Sielaff, a German tourist trying to enter the United States from Mexico with his American fiancé, was handcuffed and shackled at the border in Tijuana, and held in detention for 16 days, before being deported at his own expense. Another German tourist and a Canadian national on a work visa were stopped at the same border and detained for more than six weeks and 12 days, respectively; and Fabian Schmidt, a German national with a green card, was stopped at an airport in Boston, reportedly subjected to harsh interrogation tactics and shoved into a cold shower, naked, and ultimately sent to a detention facility.

Other incidents include a French scientist who was planning to attend a conference near Houston but denied entry, and a British artist who was held in “horrendous conditions” for three weeks

The United Kingdom and Germany have updated their travel advisory for the United States, and Western travellers are now thinking twice before booking a flight to “the land of the free,” which under Trump is experiencing a staggering descent into authoritarianism and doesn’t seem as free anymore.

For German, French, British, and other Western travellers who are used to simply booking flights and strolling past immigration counters and into their favorite holiday destinations without visas or other hassles, this is a new thought process. For travellers with “weak passports,” the struggles of crossing borders have long been a fact of life. If you are from, say, Bangladesh or Tanzania and want to visit a Western country, you may not have to literally strip naked like Mr. Schmidt, but figuratively.

You will likely be required to disclose your employment history and financial situation, and be asked about your family, past travel, and social media activities. You also need to plan far ahead, as often it is impossible to get a timely interview appointment at the relevant embassy.

The long wait for a visa

According to the latest available data, the wait times for an interview for a visitor visa to the United States in, for example, Abidjan, Bogota, Dhaka, Lagos, and Mexico City are 280, 507, 288, 377, and 350 days, respectively. If you make it to the interview, you are at the mercy of a consular officer who decides whether or not to approve your visa application. If you are unlucky, your visa will be refused and you’ll be handed a piece of paper that says: “Today’s decision cannot be appealed.”

What you’ll not be handed, of course, is a refund for the overpriced application fee. In this situation, the consular officer is a mini dictator and the foreign traveller has fewer rights than a convicted murderer. After all, the murderer can appeal.

Trump's new travel ban

With regard to the United States, things are set to get even worse for some travellers without the privilege of a strong passport. Trump is planning a new edition of the infamous Muslim Ban that resulted in chaos at airports, protests, and lawsuits during his first term. His new travel ban could target 43 countries, more than half of them in Africa.

Many Americans will be okay with that, as people rarely question the right of sovereign nations to set their visa and immigration policies as they see fit. This is because international travel is seen as a privilege rather than a right. But is it? Any other policy that unfairly disadvantages people based on characteristics over which they have no meaningful control, such as their ethnicity, race, sex, gender, religious upbringing, or native language, would rightly be unacceptable.

So, when it comes to borders, why do we accept policies that blatantly discriminate against people, mostly from poorer countries, on the basis of where they were born? The world is more interconnected than ever, and the ability to move freely is essential to being able to take advantage of the professional, educational, and personal opportunities provided by globalisation—it should not be determined by a person’s place of birth.

#trump

Challenging Trump's travel discrimination | Why do we accept unequal policies?

Reserve Bank expected to keep interest rates on hold amid VAT, inflation pressures

Trump's new policy: relaxing protections for migratory birds