FILE - Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. 31.10.18. File photo: Thobile Mathonsi/African News agency/ANA
FILE - Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. 31.10.18. File photo: Thobile Mathonsi/African News agency/ANA

Public Protector Mkhwebane clears Ramaphosa, ministers in investigations

By Mayibongwe Maqhina Time of article published Sep 29, 2021

Share this article:

Johannesburg – Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has closed some of the investigations involving allegations made against President Cyril Ramaphosa and some ministers.

Mkhwebane was asked to probe a breach of the constitution, the executive ethics and violation of the code of ethical conduct and disclosure of members’ interests, among other things.

In a statement, Mkhwebane said her office applied the applicable laws to the facts and made conclusions.

“Throughout the various investigations, we sought to establish what happened, what should have happened and whether there was a discrepancy between the two and whether discrepancy, if any, constituted maladministration and improper conduct,” she said.

In a complaint by whistleblower Thabiso Zulu against President Ramaphosa, Mkhwebane said she concluded that she could not pursue the complaint made in April 2020.

Mkhwebane said Zulu alleged that after the assassination attempt on his life in October 2019, Ramaphosa promised him he was to be taken to a place of safety and be provided with protection.

“Based on the complaint and analysis of the documentation received, the public protector has come to the conclusion that it would therefore be improper to pursue the matter further and make any pronouncement on the allegation that the president failed to uphold the constitution, based on an alleged promise he made to Mr Zulu as no evidence of such an undertaking could be established.”

She also said it was also unclear how Ramaphosa would constitute a failure to uphold the Constitution on his part.

“Furthermore, when Mr Zulu was finally provided with such protection, he personally asked to be removed from it for personal reasons thereby rendering the basis for his complaint to the public protector inconsequential,” she said.

Mkhwebane also said she found no evidence to support the allegation that former health minister Zweli Mkhize interfered in the Public Investment Corporations’s processes and procedures in his capacity as the treasurer-general of the ANC during 2016.

“This conclusion is also supported by the fact that there was no initial loan application which was declined by the PIC as was alleged in the complaint and reported in the media.”

Nathaniel Denton Bricknell, the secretary-general of African Democratic Change, requested an investigation following reports in June 2018 that Mkhize unduly benefited from a loan transaction to the value of R210 million between Africoil and the PIC.

Mkhwebane said the evidence indicated that the disbursements of the funds to Africoil was not arbitrary, but followed a due diligence and approval process.

“The PIC officials who were involved in the due diligence process did not provide any evidence indicating that they were unduly influenced to deviate from the processes of the PIC in processing the Africoil loan application.”

Mkhwebane also said the allegations of involvement of Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan in the recruitment process of the Mango Airlines CEO could not be corroborated.

EFF deputy leader Floyd Shivambu lodged the complaint in October 2019, claiming Gordhan illegally instructed the board chairperson, Matsidiso Peter Tshisevhe, to ensure that Nico Bezuidenhout was appointed.

“Minister Gordhan’s involvement in the appointment of Mr Bezuidenhout was in line with the Memorandum of Incorporation, which requires him to approve the appointment of the CEO of Mango, being a wholly owned subsidiary of the SAA.”

She also said the investigation into allegations that former finance minister Tito Mboweni irregularly appointed Ranjeni Munusamy as a community outreach officer could not be corroborated.

Shivambu lodged a complaint in October 2020 and asked whether Munusamy’s appointment was made in terms of the Public Service Act and whether it was acceptable and rational for Mboweni to appoint Munusamy when she was implicated in the Zondo commission for receiving money from the state intelligence funds.

Mkhwebane said she concluded that the appointment of Munusamy was made in terms of the Public Service Act.

Regarding the complaint against former DA leader Mmusi Maimane, Mkhwebane said it did not fall within her jurisdiction because he resigned as an MP in October 2019.

Hindu Unity Movement leader Jayraj Bachu lodged a complaint in October 2019 after Maimane declared in the MPs’ register interest a property in Cape Town as his own though it belonged to a shelf company owned by a Durban businessman Wessel Jacobs.

She said the matter did not fall within her jurisdiction.

“This is to say Mr Maimane was not performing a public function in any of the state departments nor administrative functions in the national, provincial and local spheres of government.”

Political Bureau

Share this article: