Mitchells Plain teacher wins appeal against WCED disciplinary action
The Western Cape Education Department faces scrutiny following a Labour Court ruling that orders the removal of a final warning from a teacher's record.
Image: File
The Western Cape Education Department (WCED) finds itself under scrutiny once again, facing a significant setback in a disciplinary case involving a teacher from Mitchells Plain.
In a recent ruling, the Labour Court has mandated the removal of a final warning from Shamim Abrahams’ record, a decision that underscores the department's mismanagement in handling the situation.
Additionally, it has been ordered to pay Princeton High School teacher, Shamim Abrahams, the remuneration to which he would have been entitled had he not been suspended without pay for three months.
The department said a decision on whether it would appeal the outcome has yet to be made.
“The WCED is aware of the outcome and is reviewing the Labour Court finding. A decision on whether we will take this matter on appeal will be forthcoming,” spokesperson Bronagh Hammond said.
The matter culminated from a 2017 incident in which a learner, who often bunked classes, accused Abrahams of having forcibly removed him from the class, swore at him, and told him not to return.
According to the learner’s grandmother, as his guardian after the learner’s mother passed away, Abrahams labelled her grandchild a ‘problem child’.
The grandmother admitted that her grandchild was not a model learner, and according to the record, the grandchild swore at Abrahams.
The record reflected that the grandmother instructed the learner to apologise to Abrahams for swearing at him, despite the pupil denying that he swore at Abrahams, but apologised anyway.
Following an internal disciplinary process, Abrahams was found guilty of misconduct.
Abrahams, who was a maths teacher at the school and represented himself in the matter, argued that the commissioner committed a gross irregularity in the proceedings by relying on evidence from the learner, despite the learner’s failure to avail himself for further cross-examination.
In the absence of being able to cross-examine the learner, Labour Court Judge Reynaud Daniels said Abrahams was unfairly deprived of a proper opportunity to complete the cross-examination of an important witness.
Judge Daniels stated that this constituted a gross irregularity in the proceedings and that Abrahams was deprived of his rights to a fair trial.
When he testified, the learner submitted that he used to bunk classes during Grade 8, including the maths classes of Abrahams.
“In September 2015, he was suspended for bunking. An incident occurred during which a stone was thrown at the applicant (Abrahams). The applicant accused Learner A (the pupil), but he denied any involvement. During the first or second term of 2015, during class, one of the learners threw a piece of paper at the applicant. The applicant believed that Learner A had done so and told him to leave the room.
“Learner A testified that he walked out of the classroom while the applicant took his school bag (and) threw it out, saying ‘get the f**k out’. Later, after Learner A was urged to read the charge sheet, he changed his testimony, saying the applicant pulled him from his chair by his collar,” the record read.
Abrahams pleaded not guilty to the three charges he faced and testified that the pupil was “disruptive, dysfunctional, and disrespectful”.
He also testified that he did not swear at the learner nor did he physically expel him from class, and denied the content of the charges against him. He stated that they were a fabrication.
Judge Daniels said the learner contradicted his own evidence in material respects and manufactured his version to align with the charges.
Responding to the outcome, Special Action Committee Education (SACE) Chairperson Terrence Smith said: “SACE's view has consistently been that the WCED is run in a bureaucratic manner and is very seldom an ‘honest broker’ in labour-related matters. We are not surprised that the court ruled against the WCED in favour of the employee.
“We must not be surprised if the WCED takes the judgment on appeal to delay justice being served. We call for the WCED and the DA to be investigated for wasting and abusing scarce public funds.”
Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus