Presidency takes Jacob Zuma to High Court to reclaim R28 million
The high court showdown follows a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that Zuma was not entitled to taxpayer-funded legal support, and must reimburse the state.
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
The High Court in Pretoria is set for a critical hearing as the Presidency and State Attorney pursue the recovery of over R28 million in legal fees incurred by former President Jacob Zuma.
This legal action follows a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that determined Zuma is not entitled to taxpayer-funded legal support and must reimburse the state.
The South African government's legal battle to recover over R28.9 million spent on Zuma's defence in the arms deal corruption case is rooted in a complex web of political, legal, and international factors.
The R28.9 million was allocated to cover Zuma's legal expenses during his defence against charges related to the 1999 arms procurement deal. These funds were used for legal representation and associated costs throughout the protracted legal proceedings.
The state is now seeking to reclaim this amount, along with interest, following a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that Zuma was ineligible for taxpayer-funded legal assistance and must reimburse the state.
Zuma’s legal team, citing financial constraints, has argued that repayment is not feasible, but the state is ready to enforce the debt, including the potential garnishment of his pension.
Observers say the case could have far-reaching implications, not only for Zuma but also for the principle of accountability for public officials. Political leaders have already weighed in, with some advocating for strict enforcement to ensure that state resources are safeguarded.
The case has attracted national attention, reflecting broader public debates over Zuma’s legal battles, his time in office, and the use of state funds for private legal matters.
As the High Court hearing approaches, all eyes will be on Pretoria to see whether the former president will be compelled to settle a bill that has already stirred controversy and political commentary across the country.
Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus