Major-General Rhoode found not guilty of illegal investigation

Major-General Wally Rhoode, head of the Presidential Protection Services, has been exonerated by the South African Police Service (SAPS) following a disciplinary hearing regarding findings from Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka two years ago.

Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia confirmed that Rhoode underwent the hearing in accordance with SAPS disciplinary regulations.

“He was found not guilty of any misconduct related to the findings of the Public Protector in that he conducted an illegal investigation in relation to the robbery at the Phala Phala farm of the President, Mr M C Ramaphosa, in Limpopo in February 2020,” Cachalia said.

He also said Rhoode was still an active member of the SAPS and held the position of head of Presidential Protection Service.

Cachalia was responding to ATM parliamentary leader Vuyo Zungula, who enquired about the disciplinary action taken against Rhoode after Gcaleka found that he conducted an illegal investigation into robbery at the Phala-Phala farm in February 2020.

“Major-General Rhoode was subjected to a formal disciplinary trial as contemplated in the SAPS Disciplinary Regulations, 2016,” Cachalia said.

ATM spokesperson Zama Ntshona had not commented when his party was asked for a comment at the time of publishing.

In June 2023, Gcaleka, in her report on allegations of misconduct by Ramaphosa, found that Rhoode was not authorised to investigate the burglary on the farm.

Ramaphosa reported the burglary to Rhoode, who allegedly investigated the incident.

Gcaleka found that Rhoode had acted improperly when conducting an investigation and that he did not have the power to launch the off-the-books investigation into the burglary.

She also did not accept his version that he was conducting a threat analysis.

In her remedial action, Gcaleka instructed former police minister Bheki Cele to acknowledge the findings of maladministration and improper conduct against the SAPS, particularly regarding allegations that police officers in the Presidential Protection Services acted improperly by investigating the Phala Phala burglary.

Meanwhile, responding to a separate parliamentary question from ActionSA MP Dereleen James, Cachalia said the classification of documents was done in line with the Minimum Information Security Standards (MISS) as approved by Cabinet on December 4, 1996.

The minister said the IPID report had the propensity to disrupt the effective execution of information or operational planning and/or plans as well as to seriously damage operational relations between institutions.

“In light of these, it was absolutely necessary to classify the report ‘Top Secret’. The report will remain so classified until these elements are no longer in existence,” Cachalia said.

Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.

Cape Argus