Constitutional Court dismisses MKP's case against President Ramaphosa

The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) has threatened protests after the Constitutional Court unanimously dismissed its case against President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place police minister Senzo Mchunu on leave, appoint Prof Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister, and establish the Madlanga commission of inquiry.

Ramaphosa placed Mchunu on special leave after serious allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi that he colluded with a criminal syndicate, accepted illicit payments, interfered in investigations and disbanded a specialised task force into political killings. 

The court ruled that the MKP had erred when it took the matter to the apex court, adding that the matter failed to engage the court's exclusive jurisdiction.

Justice Rammaka Mathopo said no case had been made out for direct access to the Constitutional Court and that full reasons for the order would follow.

"It is clear that the application of the law in this country has eyes, and unfortunately, this is something that the people of South Africa must take into their own hands. We might have to consider taking the matter to the street. However, to be honest, this is a travesty of justice. We will have to consult as this is a very serious issue, as to what the next steps are. But in this country, to be honest, more than anything else, this is a travesty of justice," said MKP spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela outside court.

Reacting to the judgment, MKP legal representative Dali Mpofu SC indicated that the party's legal team would be studying the judgment while also considering options.

"It's a shock. However, we will be consulting with our client. I can't deal with the merits of the case now for obvious reasons. No case is pending as we speak.  I  do not know what is going to happen concerning this matter.  We might return to this court, or we might go elsewhere."

Reacting to the judgment, constitutional law expert Richard Spoor indicated that the Constitutional Court places a premium on its jurisdiction and it was expected that the case would be dismissed.

"It was expected that the case would be dismissed. All I can say is that this happens quite frequently. The Constitutional Court is very jealous of which cases it allows to come to it. It is not going to hear every case that comes its way. It will look into whether the matter is of any constitutional significance. If it is not, it will dismiss it. It is not surprising, as this court is overloaded, and you have to make a very good case to approach it directly," he said.

Reacting to the judgment on social media, former Eskom CEO, Matshela Koko said:" This is the same Constitutional Court that granted Justice Zondo direct access and allowed Zuma to be jailed without trial. Zondo was not asked why he did not go to the magistrate's court first."

Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.

Cape Argus