Cape Argus News

Malmesbury commuters boycott taxis over contract driver ban

Mandilakhe Tshwete|Published

Commuters in Malmesbury call for taxi boycott after contract driver ban.

Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers

Malmesbury commuters have called for a boycott of local minibus taxis after the Malmesbury Taxi Association (MTA) disrupted contract transport services that many residents rely on.

This comes after a notice circulated by the MTA declared that all contract taxi arrangements would expire at the end of April, effectively halting operations for drivers who transport residents under fixed monthly agreements.

“No taxis will be allowed to drive any contract people,” the notice read.

But commuters say the move unfairly penalises them financially and logistically.

“This is going to impact our pockets the most,” said one commuter, who asked not to be named.

“We pay the contract vehicles once a month and don’t have to worry for the rest of the month.

"With taxis, we must always have cash. We pay between R500 and R800 with the contracts — it’s about double that with taxis.”

She added: “Taxis don’t even drop us in front of our homes, just at the corners. We still have to walk the rest of the way. There has been a call to boycott the taxis because of this.”

In response to the backlash, MTA chairperson Lubabalo Mtikitiki denied that all contract drivers were being banned.

“That notice was only for those who don’t have permits to use their vehicles for contracts,” he said.

“We’re talking about people who buy cars and take customers without any legal documents. We’ve not stopped everyone from operating.”

Malmesbury Taxi Association allegedly bars contract drivers from operating.

Image: Facebook

According to Mtikitiki, the concern is about unfair competition and loss of revenue.

“These drivers wait at the taxi rank for loads while already collecting monthly fees from commuters.

"That’s not right. They’re not operating legally, and they’re taking our customers with far lower fees. That’s damaging our business.”

He said that while taxis must pick up and drop off from designated ranks, contract drivers often collect people directly from their homes.

“We’re not allowed to do that. But they are doing it and it gives them an unfair advantage.”

Mtikitiki insisted the association is not trying to exclude legitimate drivers.

“Those with proper permits and proof of contract agreements with companies or organisations are allowed to operate. We have even arranged a taxi specifically for frontline workers after a meeting with them on Monday.”

He also raised concerns about non-local operators entering the area.

“We have a big problem with foreigners and people from outside the area using vehicles to take our customers. We’ve asked the municipality to help us address this, and we’re still waiting for a response.”

Swartland Municipality spokesperson Mart-Marié Haasbroek confirmed that although regulation of the taxi industry falls under the Western Cape Provincial Department of Mobility and the Provincial Regulatory Entity (PRE), the municipality is stepping in to prevent possible escalation.

“This issue could disrupt residents’ lives and potentially escalate to a more serious situation where lives may be at risk,” Haasbroek said.

“Under the leadership of executive mayor Harold Cleophas and the mayoral committee, Swartland Municipality has taken a facilitating role, in cooperation with the South African Police Service. One meeting has already taken place, and a follow-up is scheduled for next week.”

The municipality is hoping that continued dialogue will produce a solution that balances the needs of commuters and taxi operators.

Cape Argus