Weekend Argus Lifestyle

Radiant ransomware group targets Kido Schools in shocking data breach

The Washington Post|Published

Hackers targeted a British school leaving parents in shock

Image: Stock image

 A recent cyberattack targeting British nursery schools has left parents in shock and disbelief. In late September, families received alarming news that hackers had infiltrated a chain of nursery schools, stealing sensitive data and photographs of thousands of children. The culprits, known as the “Radiant” ransomware group, demanded a ransom of £600,000 (approximately $800,000) in exchange for not releasing the stolen information, which included home addresses and vital personal details.

However, in an unexpected twist, Radiant baulked under public pressure and retracted their initial demands. Just a week after their initial extortion, they reached out to parents to announce: “Never mind.” In a communications exchange with a BBC cybersecurity reporter, they expressed remorse, stating, “We are sorry for hurting kids,” promising that all child data was being deleted to comfort worried parents.

This unprecedented apology has raised eyebrows throughout the cybersecurity community, prompting questions about the motivations behind this unexpected concession. Jamie MacColl, a senior cybersecurity research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, speculated that it may have been more of a risk management decision than a genuine moral awakening for the notorious hacking group. “I wouldn’t give them too much credit,” MacColl said, adding that the targeted outrage aimed at children likely contributed to their quick retreat.

The outrage surrounding the attack was significant, with many characterising it as a new low point in cybercrime. Graeme Stewart, a cybersecurity expert, labelled it as deeply troubling due to the nature of the targets involved. In an age where children’s data is often an underprotected asset, it’s clear that public sentiment played a vital role in shining a light on this egregious breach.

Yet, it wasn't only public disdain that influenced Radiant's decision. MacColl suggested there might be internal pressures within the hacker community, particularly from Russian-speaking cybercriminals who wanted to distance themselves from the fallout. As the incident garnered media attention, there was an evident need for the group to reduce scrutiny from law enforcement agencies.

The attack on Kido Schools, which currently manages 18 nurseries in London and has branches in the United States and India, comes as part of a broader epidemic of cybercrime escalating across the UK. Recent high-profile hacks have targeted various institutions, including notable brands such as Harrods and Marks and Spencer, alongside essential services like the London Underground. In light of a cyberattack that halted production at luxury carmaker Jaguar Land Rover, the UK government is working to bolster protections against such threats.

As families absorbed the implications of potentially compromised data, many expressed their distress regarding the breach of their children's images and private information. Parents recounted the horror of being contacted directly by gang members on their mobile devices, pressured to implore the nursery company to pay the ransom. The hackers justified their demand, insisting they warranted compensation for exposing weaknesses in the nursery’s data security.

Kido Schools did not respond to requests for comment regarding the hack or the potential extent of the data breach. Meanwhile, cybersecurity officials continued to advocate against paying ransoms, encouraging victims instead to strengthen defences.

Despite Radiant's abrupt decision to retract their threats, the sense of relief for parents is overshadowed by uncertainty. As they proclaimed to have deleted all stolen data, cybersecurity experts maintain that there’s no guarantee this is the truth—hackers may apologise, but dishonesty remains a fundamental part of their operations.

As the world grapples with the implications of this incident, experts are left questioning whether this moral backtrack signifies a rare shift in the hacker ethos or simply a tactical retreat from an untenable situation.